Parameters of Jurisprudence (LAW)
Highest to lowest
-
Everything derives from here, as this scope encompasses the spiritual, metaphysical, and physical aspects of life itself. These laws are irrefutable as no one can change them.
All man made law has to include these divine principles, because to exclude them is bound to create disorder.
Once you understand the laws of the universe, you’ll be able to see how it exists in every subordinate law; you may also see how a law lacks it’s essence.
(1) The Law of Divine Oneness - All things in the universe are connected and part of a single, unified whole.
(2) Law of Vibration - Nothing in the universe is static; everything is in motion and vibrates at a specific frequency.
(3)Law of Attraction - Like energy attracts like energy, drawing similar thoughts, people, and circumstances to you.
(4)Law of Correspondence - "As within, so without" – your inner world reflects your outer world.
(5)Law of Action -You must take action to manifest your desires and bring thoughts into reality
(6)Law of Cause and Effect - Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, a fundamental principle of the universe
(7) Law of Compensation - You will receive the rewards for the efforts you put forth.
(8) Law of Perpetual Transmutation of Energy - Energy constantly transforms from one form to another, and you can change the vibrations of the universe by changing your own.
(9) Law of Relativity - Everything is relative and has no meaning except in relation to other things.
(10) Law of Polarity - Everything has an opposite, and these opposites are two sides of the same coin, necessary for balance.
(11) Law of Rhythm - The universe moves in cycles, like a pendulum, and everything has a natural flow and pattern.
(12) Law of Gender - Everything has masculine and feminine principles, with balance and harmony needed for completion.
-
Natural law tends to be more specific/scientific, focusing on the physical and empirical.
Natural laws are derived from the observable, physical world, while universal laws, in some contexts, are seen as deeper, possibly non-physical principles.
Scientific laws are a subset of universal laws, as the laws of physics are considered universal in their application to the universe.
Natural laws are universal, inherent moral and ethical principles that are discoverable through human reason and believed to be a part of the natural order of the universe, not created by humans or governments. This theory, with roots in ancient philosophy, suggests that these fundamental laws provide a basis for human rights, justice, and proper conduct, informing the creation of positive (man-made) laws to ensure they align with these higher moral standards.
More specifically,
Human Rights: The idea of inherent human rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, is a core concept derived from natural law
Ethics and Morality: Principles like honesty, compassion, and the prohibition of murder are often cited as examples of natural law, as they promote human flourishing
Critique of Positive Law: If a man-made law (positive law) contradicts a natural law—for instance, a law that allows for unfair treatment—it is considered unjust and illegitimate
-
Are customs that are unwritten rules and traditions belonging typically to indigenous, aboriginal, or a certain group of people.
This included religious practices of polytheism or monotheism.
-
Positive law in simplest terms is manmade law, with the highest of them in modern times being ecclesiastical or canon law.
-
The law merchant is ancient customary law for merchants and trade, that was first written in the 14th century and made into national law in the 18th and 19th centuries.
Present day, this is considered private international law, admiralty law, maritime law, and contract law.
-
The concept of common law also known as procedural law developed in England from the 11th century onward, becoming a fixed body of law through the writ system.
Common law established general rules and procedures that provided certainty but could also become rigid and inflexible over time.
-
Equity law also known as substantial law began to develop in the 13th century and became well-established by the 15th century as a distinct but complementary system to common law.
It was created to address the shortcomings and inflexibility of common law, allowing for remedies based on fairness, conscience, and the specific circumstances of a case.
Equity acts as a check on common law, providing flexible application of broad moral principles to specific situations to achieve justice where common law procedures would lead to injustice.
Equity law recognizes substance over form.
In the “Earl of Oxford’s case (1615)” King James I, upheld the use of the equitable injunction and concluded that in the event of any conflict between the common law and equity, equity would prevail.
Areas of exclusive equity:
the law relating to express, resulting, and constructive trusts;
fiduciary law;
restitution from fraud;
equitable estoppel (including promissory and proprietary estoppel);
relief against penalties and relief against forfeiture;
unconscionable, unreasonable, unfair situations
specific performance;
injunctions;
the doctrines of contribution, subrogation and marshalling; and
equitable set-off.
-
Also known as, constitutional law which is the “supreme law” of the land. The Constitution for the United State of America, is also called the federal constitution.
A nation state is a political system where a single, sovereign state is largely congruent with a single, distinct nation, meaning a group of people sharing a common culture, language, and identity.
The concept of the nation-state emerged in Europe after the decline of feudalism and the Holy Roman Empire, around the 15th century.
The French Revolution further solidified the idea that nations should have their own states and that these states should be synonymous with those nations.
Law enacted by Congress is codified into the United States Code (U.S.C.) and then the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
A new edition of U.S.C. is published every six years, with annual supplements providing updates to reflect new laws and amendments enacted by Congress.
Regulations are initially published as proposed and final rules in the Federal Register and then compiled annually into the CFR for easier access and understanding.
-
This is your local state statutory orders, regulations, ordinances, policies, etc.
Now, do you still believe that Nation State Law aka the Federal Constitution is the Supreme Law of The Land?
In the Federal Constitution itself, they actually elude to a higher jurisdiction (Lex Mercatoria) in Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 where it reads, “No state shall pass any law impairing the obligations of contracts…” – This is like the secondary Supremacy Clause within the Supreme Law of the Land, as we know the Lex Mercatoria/Private International Law is a function of the Federal Nation State, as they regulate foreign affairs with other nation states, all while they reserved the right to create a law that “could possibly” impair the obligation of contracts.
Now even though they fused equity into common law courts, while seemingly removing equity from the common law courts in 1933-1938, equity still always will win over procedural laws.
Remember that:
Common law = Procedural Rights, protected by the 5th amendment
Equity = Substantive Rights, protected by the 14th amendment (for freed slaves)
Since 1938, our common law courts where equity is supposed to be the held, now only exists in our federal district courts, and our supreme court, but we have to go through so many hoops procedurally. In West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish (March 29, 1937) and United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (April 25, 1938), the precedent was set for State courts to be able to, in simplest terms, enforce strict liability according to state statutory orders, regulations, and ordinances as long as there is compelling state/government interest.
The Court largely abandoned this strict "substantive due process" interpretation by 1937, returning power to legislatures to enact economic regulations for public welfare. Today, "freedom of contract" is not considered a fundamental right under the Due Process Clauses. – effectively called Repudiation of "Lochnerism”
To this day, (only if you demand such) the Court usually looks first to see if there is a fundamental right, by examining if the right can be found deeply rooted in American history and traditions. Where the right is not a fundamental right, the court applies a rational basis test: if the violation of the right can be rationally related to a legitimate government purpose, then the law is held valid. If the court establishes that the right being violated is a fundamental right, it applies strict scrutiny. This test inquires into whether there is a compelling state interest being furthered by the violation of the right, and whether the law in question is narrowly tailored to address the state interest.
What this mean in simplest terms, the States are allowed to presume “strict liability” which removes the State’s obligation to prove “criminal intent” from traffic stops, meaning, if you did it, it legally amounts to, you’re guilty, for crimes where there is no injured party. By doing this, they effectively removed equity from state courts.
Strict liability is held to “strict scrutiny” only if you properly challenge that the enforcement of a statute or regulation is violating a fundamental right. Equity is only there if you invoke it. Hint: Sole-proprietors have strict liability (SSN, 1935 and SSA OASI 1940)
Confer with, Mugler v. Kansas (1887) which was the predecessor for the “Lochner era”, and laissez-faire constitutionalism, and Lochner v. New York (1905), and the New Deal (1935-1938) from President Roosevelt, and West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish (March 29, 1937). You can also read into, “the switch in time that saved nine” - Justine Owen Roberts.
If you would like to setup a consultation to learn how you can claim exclusive equity, ecclesiastical law, and universal law to get the judge to honor your God given dominion and fundamentally protected rights.